Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 03:13

Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Thank you.
Switch, Xbox, and the portable future of games - The Verge
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
23andMe says 15% of customers asked to delete their genetic data since bankruptcy - TechCrunch
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Saepe maiores nam debitis sequi corporis quasi quasi dolores.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Horoscope for Tuesday, June 03, 2025 - Chicago Sun-Times
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
How many boxes 600 x 400 x 200 go into a 20ft container?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Nintendo will finally reveal more about Donkey Kong Bananza in new Direct - Polygon
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What’s next?
WWDC 2025: New Features We Could See in watchOS 26 - MacRumors
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Cal Raleigh’s latest home run sets multiple records - Seattle Sports